ASSOCIATES (2005, November, v. 12, no. 2) - associates.ucr.edu

Letters To The Editor

Letters to the Editor may be sent to:
      Wendee Eyler, Editor,
Associates
      rivwe@ucr.edu

************

Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005
From: Dr. Mayank Trivedi, Gujarat-India
Subject: Information regarding the employment in the field of Library Science

Dear Sir,

First of all thank you very much for Associates newsletter. It is very much informative and helpful to Library professionals. I would like to get the employment opportunities for Library Professionals in US. My post, designation and qualification is mentioned below. I would be highly obliged if you may give me some guidance in this regard.

Thanking you in anticipation,

Yours faithfully,

(Dr.Mayank Trivedi)
            B.Sc.,Dip. in Comp.Sci.,MLISc, Ph.D.

[Editor: (my reply) Thank you for writing and for your positive comments regarding the journal Associates. Many print and online sources are available for employment opportunities. Three online sources used frequently are:

Chronicle of Higher Education: http://chronicle.com/
ALA Hot Job Online: http://www.ala.org/ala/education/empopps/careerleadsb/hotjobsonline/hotjobsonline.htm
Job ads from American Libraries: http://www.ala.org/ala/education/empopps/careerleadsb/alonlinejobads/jobadsamerican.htm]

************

Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:28 AM
From: Max Macias
Subject: I just received about 20 emails...

I just received about 20 emails from Associates. Is there something wrong? Thanks for all your hard work!

Max

[Editor: (my reply): Hi Max. You are subscribed to ASSOCIATES--the email version. Subscribers to ASSOCIATES will receive the entire, full-text contents of the new issue, resulting in approximately 20 separate emails sent directly to you on the day of publication. Would you prefer that I change your subscription to AssociatesWeb? ASSOCIATESWEB subscribers will receive ONE email announcing that the new issue of ASSOCIATES is available on the webpage at http://associates.ucr.edu. I can change your subscription for you--please let me know.]

***

Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005
From: Kim Patton
Subject: Re: [Associatesweb] Problems with email system for AssociatesWebnotification

TRY about 30!!!! Take me off of the list!!!! It's ridiculous!!! KP

[Editor: When Associates first began publication in 1994, the journal was issued as email--web sites were not commonplace then. Now, subscribers have a choice of receiving either the email version OR notification that the newest web version is available. About half of Associates subscribers wish to receive the email version. I have indicated on the subscription page to Associates that subscribers to ASSOCIATES will receive the entire, full-text contents of the new issue, resulting in approximately 20 SEPARATE EMAILS sent directly to you on the day of publication. To receive only ONE email to notify you when the new issue is on the web, then you should only subscribe to ASSOCIATESWEB]

***

Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005
From: Wendy Robinson (Australia)
Subject: Associates email

Wendee

I have just received a whole list of foreign emails from you, I think they may have been sent to the wrong person. I know nothing about them.

Regards

Wendy

[Editor: I checked the subscription list and Wendy was subscribed to Associates (the email version). For subscription purposes, "Associates" is the email version and "AssociatesWeb" is the webpage notification method--even though the journal itself is called "Associates." I contacted Wendy and changed her subscription method to AssociatesWeb.]

************

Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2005
From: Arlene Eis, Editor
Subject: The Informed Librarian Online

Dear Editor:

For your information: The Informed Librarian Online (www.informedlibrarian.com) links to every issue of Associates on the web, along with 300 other titles that we follow. Our mission is to bring all of the professional reading to the librarian's desktop every month. As a result, we bring more readers to your web page of tables of contents or full-text articles on an ongoing basis. In addition, we index your articles in our new, powerful ILOSearch database, so they are searchable in our online database.

We would appreciate if you could include a mention of The Informed Librarian Online in Associates.

Thanks so much for your help.

Arlene Eis, Editor

[Editor: Michael D. Brooks gave a product review of The Informed Librarian Online in March 2004 (vol. 10, no. 3) issue of Associates. See the product review at: http://associates.ucr.edu/pbro304.htm]

************

Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2005; Friday, October 7, 2005;
From: Elaine Hernandez
Subject: Questions about Associates

HI Wendee

Who is on the board of Associates? I have always felt one could say it like it is [in Associates] What I am wondering, is there any censorship--which is different than editing?

[Editor: (my reply) Elaine, good questions! The Editorial Board is comprised of 5 members: Katie Kintner; Bessie Mayes; Sylvia Skene, Susan Ryan; Joy Wanden (see full details at the Associates webpage at: http://associates.ucr.edu/705editor.htm) The Editorial Board is an advisory group that helps determine the overall scope, direction, and policies of the publication. Associates is totally unaffiliated with ANY organization or association. My campus has given me free access to a website and listservs. The library allows me some work time to answer emails and get the issue out, etc. I'm not held accountable in any way to the library or university for the contents of Associates. If an article is a personal attack on a specific individual--well, that's not acceptable. If it's about librarian vs. library assistant--we have those articles all the time. I am the final judge on what is published. I have never run into any topic that was unacceptable. I'm rather liberal and open in my views on what's publishable--fiction, articles on any library topic, even unfavorable reviews. If I felt concern about the contents of the article, I would probably pick up the phone and call the author and we would talk about it. Simple as that. If it became a policy decision, then I would get the Editorial Board involved.]



About Us | Subscribe/Unsubscribe | Editors | Submit | Current Issue | Archives | Home